Skip to main content

Emmanuel Bradshaw-Wk 9- Theatre of Witness response

During both of these chapters "Did you understand what you are dying for" and "Twelve guiding

principles of theatre of witness", they touched on empathy and how perception can change how you

see someone else. At the beginning of Did you understand what you are dying for, it was about the

soldier in battle. Later, the end of the chapter ended with someone who was on the other side of the

battle. Someone who was truly affected. Someone who found out her mother had her husband killed

directly in front of her. While on the theatre of witness dealt with listening to a person's story

regardless of what empathetic reaction the listener feels the need to say. This i feel can apply to

anything that deals with listening regardless of context. Those are my thoughts

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Clare Morrissey-Art and Social Change Reader- Week 6

Art and Social Change Invisible Theatre               Invisible Theatre is the art of creating a performance in spaces that are not stages. The people who witness it cannot be aware it is a performance or else they would become spectators. The way this can be done is creating a solid and locked script that the actors stick to but also know it so well it allows flexibility and the ability for them to mess with it when the people witnessing the act give input or there is any disruption. The actors will prepare for anything when it comes to their performance. It is imperative to choose a location where people gather in large groups in the public. An example of how this is done is by having actors play in a scene in a crowded restaurant with many patrons. You have one actor make a big fuss over a meal they hate and the waiter offers them the nicest meal, acknowledging the price which the actor eating the meal lets it be known that the price is o...

Emmanuel Bradshaw-Monuments article-wk4

While reading some of the monuments pieces I felt as if each of them had something that they  needed to prove. For example, for the Tate piece felt the need to expose what history has done to  people. Each level exposed how much each person was taken advantage of in service of someone  else. For the rumors of war piece exposed the whole idealism of the past resurrecting a past historical  leader to make sure that the event does not happen again. The Bracero monument exposed all of the  work that the people of that time had done in order to make sure that not another person is taken  advantage of again. But truth be told, all of these monuments have come with some sort of backlash.  The bracero monument had gotten criticism for stating that the braceros were free to do what they  wished. From what the article had stated that was not the truth. It was merely one persons  interpretation of what a bracero was, b...

Cy Krafft - Week 5 - Beautiful Trouble

I chose three tactics for my response. Inflatables, light brigade, and hoax. The inflatable tactic stood out to me because the entry description seemed to be the opposite of what I would expect. Having giant inflatables bouncing around a protest would indeed lower the seriousness of a protest, but not in a positive way. A protest with a bunch of beach balls and balloons floating around wouldn't strike me as a group that takes its own issue seriously. But on the other hand, inflated figures on their own can have a very effective message of ridicule (see the Trump balloon). I thought the light brigade tactic was very clever. It's a relatively accessible method of sharing a message, as battery powered fairy lights are sold basically everywhere. It's also very eye-catching and legible from a distance, versus normal protest posters that are either illegible at a distance or expensive to produce in large scale. The hoax tactic was very interesting to me. I wonder when the e...