In regards to the piece on anger, It was effective because i felt the article displayed both sides of the issue. It also showed how anger can be detrimental to ones own message. The implications if the message is misinterpreted could be catastrophic. In essence, being angry for no reason can be for a person who wishes to project a reason viable to do so.
In regards to the banner piece on tactics, it was in direct support of saying what you want to say if what you believe in, has been said by multiple people. Although the solution to preeminently attach to a boat or moving object can be seen as premature. if something should be said, it should be said with pride in the biggest letters you can find.
With the topic of Commodity Fetishism, It referred to Marx as the man who thought the people have the power over the factory and labor. Which they do but, it has always been told as the factory owner has the power over the workers. He also seemed to challenge the idea that markets have a natural order to them. In this system, the humans have no real say in how labor is distributed, except in the idealism of equal parts for every person.
Those are my thoughts
In regards to the banner piece on tactics, it was in direct support of saying what you want to say if what you believe in, has been said by multiple people. Although the solution to preeminently attach to a boat or moving object can be seen as premature. if something should be said, it should be said with pride in the biggest letters you can find.
With the topic of Commodity Fetishism, It referred to Marx as the man who thought the people have the power over the factory and labor. Which they do but, it has always been told as the factory owner has the power over the workers. He also seemed to challenge the idea that markets have a natural order to them. In this system, the humans have no real say in how labor is distributed, except in the idealism of equal parts for every person.
Those are my thoughts
Comments
Post a Comment