Skip to main content

Week 5

There are a number of variances within how social movements coincide with disasters and its major counterpart of government. The shock doctrine is a way that government utilizes the first hand results of a major cultural shift or an instance of impact on the social public to either upheave regulation from the establishment by way of distraction or by false means of necessity for larger consensus control. A principal of reversal where in the public takes on events of a paradigm shift or the basis of shock doctrine with the technical tactic of "media hijacking". Occupy Wall Street was a movement in 2011 following the economic crash of 2008 where working class citizens peacefully protested in the public hemispheres of Wall Street, flooding the media stream with outrage towards Wall Street elites. This is a principle of how "anger works best when you have the moral high ground". The goals of the movement were slowly gaining momentum, generating fear from government regulators and a large number of corporate interests - despite suffering many structural issues from within, the movement was written off as anarchic and lost traction.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Clare Morrissey-Art and Social Change Reader- Week 6

Art and Social Change Invisible Theatre               Invisible Theatre is the art of creating a performance in spaces that are not stages. The people who witness it cannot be aware it is a performance or else they would become spectators. The way this can be done is creating a solid and locked script that the actors stick to but also know it so well it allows flexibility and the ability for them to mess with it when the people witnessing the act give input or there is any disruption. The actors will prepare for anything when it comes to their performance. It is imperative to choose a location where people gather in large groups in the public. An example of how this is done is by having actors play in a scene in a crowded restaurant with many patrons. You have one actor make a big fuss over a meal they hate and the waiter offers them the nicest meal, acknowledging the price which the actor eating the meal lets it be known that the price is o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Emmanuel Bradshaw-Monuments article-wk4

While reading some of the monuments pieces I felt as if each of them had something that they  needed to prove. For example, for the Tate piece felt the need to expose what history has done to  people. Each level exposed how much each person was taken advantage of in service of someone  else. For the rumors of war piece exposed the whole idealism of the past resurrecting a past historical  leader to make sure that the event does not happen again. The Bracero monument exposed all of the  work that the people of that time had done in order to make sure that not another person is taken  advantage of again. But truth be told, all of these monuments have come with some sort of backlash.  The bracero monument had gotten criticism for stating that the braceros were free to do what they  wished. From what the article had stated that was not the truth. It was merely one persons  interpretation of what a bracero was, b...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jake Jolley Week 4

How do context and identity impact the form and meaning of these artistic projects? - The context and identity impact the forms of these projects by creating a new solid standing vision of not forgetting. Meaning further that These monuments help to represent the past, as well as to honor those that act as the subject of each. As spoken about in the Guardian article, these monuments not only show the past as well as the present and future, but what it has been built on, or rather who it was built on. These projects create an identity for the minorities and remind the greater population of the struggles faced, as well as struggles still at hand. 
Post a Comment
Read more