Skip to main content

Angela Rosado, Art and Social Change; Week 6


1) Guerrilla Theater 143.
Summary: This person argues for theater for social change first focusing on the state of society and  then elaborates on the aspects of theater has not been unable to make the changes it needs to, and its need for the product to be a significant moral force. The work needs to communicate to the audience the words that everyone knows but no one was saying—the truth. The job then becomes to drop everything that instills that toxic middle-class America life and live against that; "a full time job of a full time guerrilla."

The so-called "prescription for a theatre company that is meaningful:"
  •  Prepare to go out of business at any moment.
  • Prepare to give up your house, your theatre or your troupe, and even your ideas if something more essential comes along.
  • Travel light and keep in shape.
  • Ideas like property cannot be private.
  • Nothing is sacred – only sometimes tenderness.



2) Call to the Artists of Latin America 200.
Summary: All Latinx artists wanting of change need to contribute their ideas and values to be passed down and shape the society we live in and are creating. There is no separation between the revolutionary ideas and needs of the artist and their art; their awareness of the consequences of their voice should fuel the art.


  • Art, in terms of politics, is not neutral and should never be considered as such.
  • The Latinx Artist should "denounce, reject, and destroy all forms of imperialist penetration"
  • Denounce ideas of culture being an alienating weapon
  • Dismantle ideas that art belongs to and should serve/benefit bourgeois society
  • Art is for the artist—their expression, their identity, their ideas, their journey

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Emmanuel Bradshaw-Monuments article-wk4

While reading some of the monuments pieces I felt as if each of them had something that they  needed to prove. For example, for the Tate piece felt the need to expose what history has done to  people. Each level exposed how much each person was taken advantage of in service of someone  else. For the rumors of war piece exposed the whole idealism of the past resurrecting a past historical  leader to make sure that the event does not happen again. The Bracero monument exposed all of the  work that the people of that time had done in order to make sure that not another person is taken  advantage of again. But truth be told, all of these monuments have come with some sort of backlash.  The bracero monument had gotten criticism for stating that the braceros were free to do what they  wished. From what the article had stated that was not the truth. It was merely one persons  interpretation of what a bracero was, b...